Title
MOTION TO ADOPT PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 2025-R-26.
PROPOSED RESOLUTION NO. 2025-R-26 IS A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PEMBROKE PINES, FLORIDA, COMMITTING TO FUND OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE FOR PEMBROKE ROAD AFTER COMPLETION OF THE WIDENING AND EXTENSION FROM DYKES ROAD TO US 27 PROJECT.
Summary Explanation and Background
SUMMARY EXPLANATION AND BACKGROUND:
1. The City of Pembroke Pines is partnering with the City of Miramar on the Pembroke Road widening and extension project from Dykes Road to US 27. This Broward Surtax funded project is intended to improve traffic mobility and provide alternative emergency access to US-27 in southwest Broward County.
The project consists of three primary segments:
1. Widening of Pembroke Road from Dykes Road to SW 196th Avenue,
2. Extension of Pembroke Road from SW 196th Avenue to US-27, and
3. Extension of Miramar Parkway from SW 192nd Terrace to Pembroke Road.
2. Following the completion of construction, the City of Pembroke Pines will assume maintenance responsibilities for all infrastructure components located within its municipal boundaries, which include:
• Cleaning and maintenance of drainage pipes, culverts, and outfalls
• Pavement and sidewalk upkeep
• Maintenance of shared-use paths
• Swale landscaping and irrigation
3. Joint maintenance of median landscaping and irrigation will be coordinated, between Miramar and Pembroke Pines for the segment between SW 184th Avenue and US-27.
4. Other maintenance responsibilities:
Broward County Traffic Engineering Division: Signalization, signage, pavement markings
Florida Power & Light (FPL): Lighting systems
South Broward Drainage District: Existing drainage culverts
5. Administration recommends the City Commission adopt proposed Resolution 2025-R-26 to affirm the City’s commitment to fund ongoing operations and maintenance for the City’s respective portions of the project.
Financial Impact
FINANCIAL IMPACT DETAIL:
a) Initial Cost: None
b) Amount budgeted for this item in Account No: Not Applicable
c) Source of funding for difference, if not fully budgeted: Not Applicable
d) 5-year projection of the operational cost of the project: Not Applicable
e) Detail of additional staff requirements: Not Applicable
FEASIBILITY REVIEW:
A feasibility review is required for the award, renewal, and/or expiration of all function sourcing contracts. This analysis is to determine the financial effectiveness of function sourcing services.
a) Was a Feasibility Review/Cost Analysis of Out-Sourcing vs. In-House Labor Conducted for this service? Not Applicable
b) If Yes, what is the total cost or total savings of utilizing Out-Sourcing vs. In-House Labor for this service? Not Applicable