Skip to main content
File #: 25-1763    Version: 1 Name: Raw Water Hydraulic Modeling
Type: Purchase Status: Passed
File created: 7/16/2025 In control: City Commission
On agenda: 9/3/2025 Final action: 9/3/2025
Title: MOTION TO APPROVE THE PROPOSED WORK AUTHORIZATION 2025-06 FOR RAW WATER HYDRAULIC MODELING WITH CAROLLO ENGINEERS, INC. (CAROLLO) PURSUANT TO THE AWARD OF RFQ # PSUT-22-02 "CCNA CONTINUING SERVICES FOR PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM ENGINEERING AND RELATED SERVICES", IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $76,856.00
Sponsors: Utility
Attachments: 1. 1. Pembroke Pines Work Order # 6 - Raw Water Hydraulic Model (Singed), 2. 2. CCNA Continuing Professional Svcs Agreement, 3. 3. Agreement - Exhibit C

Title

MOTION TO APPROVE THE PROPOSED WORK AUTHORIZATION 2025-06 FOR RAW WATER HYDRAULIC MODELING WITH CAROLLO ENGINEERS, INC. (CAROLLO) PURSUANT TO THE AWARD OF RFQ # PSUT-22-02 "CCNA CONTINUING SERVICES FOR PUBLIC WATER SYSTEM ENGINEERING AND RELATED SERVICES", IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $76,856.00

 

Summary Explanation and Background

 

PROCUREMENT PROCESS TAKEN:

 

- Chapter 35 of the City's Code of Ordinances is titled "PROCUREMENT PROCEDURES, PUBLIC FUNDS."

 

- Section 35.15 defines a Request for Qualifications as "A written solicitation for competitive sealed offers with the title, date and hour of the public opening designated.  A request for qualifications shall include, but is not limited to, general information, functional or general specifications, statement of work, instructions for offer and evaluation criteria. All requests for qualifications shall state the relative importance of the evaluation criteria. The city may engage in competitive negotiations with responsible offerors determined to be reasonably susceptible of being selected for award for the purpose of clarification to assure full understanding of and conformance to the solicitation requirements.  Offerors shall be accorded fair and equal treatment with respect to any opportunity for discussion and revision of offers, and such revisions may be permitted after submissions and prior to award for the purpose of obtaining the best and final offer."

 

- Section 35.18 of the City's Code of Ordinances is titled "COMPETITIVE BIDDING OR COMPETITIVE PROPOSALS REQUIRED; EXCEPTIONS."

 

- Section 35.18(A) states, "A purchase of or contract for commodities or services that is estimated by the Chief Procurement Officer to cost more than $25,000 shall be based on sealed competitive solicitations as determined by the Chief Procurement Officer, except as specifically provided herein."

 

- Section 35.19 of the City's Code of Ordinances is titled "SEALED COMPETITIVE BIDDING PROCEDURE."

 

- Section 35.19(A) states, "All sealed competitive solicitations as defined in §35.18 shall be presented to the City Commission for their consideration prior to advertisement."

 

- Florida Statute (F.S.) 287.055 is known as the “Consultant’s Competitive Negotiation Act” (CCNA).

 

- F.S. Section 287.055(2)(a) defines Professional services as “those services within the scope of the practice of architecture, professional engineering, landscape architecture, or registered surveying and mapping, as defined by the laws of the state, or those performed by any architect, professional engineer, landscape architect, or registered surveyor and mapper in connection with his or her professional employment or practice.”

 

- F.S. Section 287.055(2)(f) states “Project” means that fixed capital outlay study or planning activity described in the public notice of the state or a state agency under paragraph (3)(a). A project may include:

 

1. A grouping of minor construction, rehabilitation, or renovation activities.

 

2. A grouping of substantially similar construction, rehabilitation, or renovation activities.

 

- F.S. Section 287.055(3)(a)(1) states “Each agency shall publicly announce, in a uniform and consistent manner, each occasion when professional services must be purchased for a project the basic construction cost of which is estimated by the agency to exceed the threshold amount provided in s.287.017 for CATEGORY FIVE ($325,000) or for a planning or study activity when the fee for professional services exceeds the threshold amount provided in s.287.017 for CATEGORY TWO ($35,000), except in cases of valid public emergencies certified by the agency head. The public notice must include a general description of the project and must indicate how interested consultants may apply for consideration.”

 

- F.S. Section 287.055(2)(g) states:

(1) “A “continuing contract” is a contract for any of the following:

     a. Professional services entered into in accordance with all the procedures of this act between an agency and a firm whereby the firm provides professional services to the agency for projects in which the estimated construction costs of each individual project under the contract does not exceed $7.5 million. Beginning July 1, 2025, and each July 1 thereafter, the department shall adjust the maximum amount allowed on the preceding June 30 for each individual project in a continuing contract by using the change in the June-to-June Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers issued by the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the United States Department of Labor.  The department shall publish the adjusted amount on its website;

     b. Study activity if the fee for professional services for each individual study under the contract does not exceed $500,000; or

     c. Work of a specified nature as outlined in the contract required by the agency, with the contract being for a fixed term or with no time limitation except that the contract must provide a termination clause.

(2) Firms providing professional services under continuing contracts may not be required to bid against one another."

 

Note - Effective July 1, 2025, as published on the Department of Management Services (DMS) website, the threshold for the estimated construction cost of each individual project under a continuing contract has been increased from $7.5 million to $7,725,000, in accordance with Section 287.055(2)(g), Florida Statutes.

 

- Section 35.21 of the City's Code of Ordinances is titled "AWARD OF CONTRACT."

 

- Section 35.21(A) of the City's Code of Ordinances is titled "City Commission approval."

 

- Section 35.21(A)(1) states, "An initial purchase of, or contract for, commodities or services, in excess of $25,000, shall require the approval of the City Commission, regardless of whether the competitive bidding or competitive proposal procedures were followed."

 

SUMMARY EXPLANATION AND BACKGROUND:

 

1.  On June 21, 2023, the City Commission approved a continuing engineering services contract with Carollo pursuant to the award of RFQ # PSUT-22-02 "CCNA Continuing Services for Public Water System Engineering and Related Services" in accordance with Florida Statute 287.055, Consultants Competitive Negotiations Act (CCNA), for a five-year period.

 

2.  In lieu of establishing a maximum contract value, Utilities Department Staff proposed to present every work authorization under this contract in excess of the threshold ($25,000) stated under Section 35.21(A)(1) of the City's Code of Ordinances, to the Commission for approval. The submittal is to include the Consultant’s proposed fee as well as the available budget and relevant account number.

 

3.  Water is supplied to the City's water treatment plant (via a network of Biscayne aquifer groundwater wells, pumps and piping) where it is treated and distributed to over 170,000 water service customers in the City.  This system has been successfully operated for over 50 years.

 

4.  Over this time, the performance of this network of water wells, pumps and piping, known as the raw water system, has aged significantly and is in declined condition with limited capacity and reliability.  The first step in determining the best use of Capital Improvement funding to improve the water supply system, as needed, is to develop a computerized, mathematical hydraulic model of the raw water system.  This hydraulic model will assist Utilities Department in making decisions regarding the needed raw water system improvements, and evaluate and prioritize those identified improvements to optimize production efficiency. Some wells may require abandonment and replacement, while others may be rehabilitated or fitted with new internal equipment for improving service level and reliability.

 

5.  The City currently has a continuing services contract for public water system engineering and related services with Carollo. They are capable and qualified to perform these Raw Water Modeling Services and staff has developed and negotiated a work authorization with Carollo to perform this analysis in an amount not to exceed $76,856.  Staff has reviewed the work authorization and fee and find them to be fair, competitive and reasonable.

 

6.  Staff recommends City Commission approval of the proposed work authorization 2025-06 for Raw Water Hydraulic Modeling with Carollo pursuant to the award of RFQ # PSUT-22-02 "CCNA Continuing Services For Public Water System Engineering and Related Services", in an amount not to exceed $76,856.

 

Financial Impact

FINANCIAL IMPACT DETAIL:

 

a)   Initial Cost:  $76,856.00

b)   Amount budgeted for this item in Account No: $46,000 is available in account no. 471-533-6032-531100-0000-000-0000 (Professional Service - Engineering)

c)   Source of funding for difference, if not fully budgeted: Upon Commission's approval, $31,000 will be moved from account no. 471-533-6032-552651-0000-000-0000 (Non-Capital Meters) to account no. 471-533-6032-531100-0000-000-0000 (Professional Service - Engineering)

d)   5 year projection of the operational cost of the project:

 

 

Current FY

Year 2

Year 3

Year 4

Year 5

Revenues

N/A

N?A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Expenditures

$76,856.00

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

Net Cost

$76,856.00

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

                     

e)   Detail of additional staff requirements: Not Applicable.

 

FEASIBILITY REVIEW:

A feasibility review is required for the award, renewal and/or expiration of all function sourcing contracts.  This analysis is to determine the financial effectiveness of function sourcing services.

 

a)   Was a Feasibility Review/Cost Analysis of Out-Sourcing vs. In-House Labor Conducted for this service?  Not Applicable.

b)   If Yes, what is the total cost or total savings of utilizing Out-Sourcing vs. In-House Labor for this service? Not Applicable.