of Title
MOTION TO APPROVE PROPOSED RESOLUTION 2025-R-04.
PROPOSED RESOLUTION 2025-R-04 IS A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PEMBROKE PINES, FLORIDA; APPROVING A PLAT NOTE AMENDMENT (DELEGATION REQUEST) TO PARCEL A OF THE CHAPEL TRAIL II PLAT FOR THE APPROXIMATE 2.27-ACRE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 18490 JOHNSON STREET; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR CITY MANAGER’S DESIGNEE TO TAKE ANY ACTION NECESSARY TO IMPLEMENT THE INTENT OF THIS RESOLUTION; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
Summary Explanation and Background
SUMMARY EXPLANATION AND BACKGROUND:
1. Jeremy Shir, agent for Chabad Lubavitch of Pembroke Pines Inc., ( the "Applicant") is requesting a plat note amendment (delegation request) for parcel A of the Chapel Trail II plat generally located south of Johnson Street and west of NW 184 Avenue.
2. On December 18, 2020, the City Commission approved Ordinance 1951 authorizing the sale of 2.271 acres of property within Chapel Trail II plat parcel A (18490 Johnson Street) to the applicant.
3. The applicant is proposing to construct a mikveh or ritual bath on the property and the increased square footage requires the note on the plat to be amended.
4. The following plat note change is being requested for Parcel A of this plat:
CURRENT NOTE:
“That portion of Parcel A is restricted to 24,298 square feet of day care, 17,818 square feet of church use, 100,000 square feet of office use, and 150,000 square feet of commercial use on the relevant portion of Parcel A”
PROPOSED NOTE:
“That portion of Parcel A is restricted to 24,298 square feet of day care use, 29,818 square feet of religious use, 100,000 square feet of office use, and 150,000 square feet of commercial use.”
5. All new buildings / structures proposed on this site will need to be processed through the city development review process.
6. Administration recommends approving the plat note amendment (delegation request) for the Chapel Trail II Plat.
Financial Impact
FINANCIAL IMPACT DETAIL:
a) Initial Cost: None.
b) Amount budgeted for this item in Account No: Not Applicable.
c) Source of funding for difference, if not fully budgeted: Not Applicable.
d) 5 year projection of the operational cost of the project: Not Applicable.
e) Detail of additional staff requirements: Not Applicable.
FEASIBILITY REVIEW:
a) Was a Feasibility Review/Cost Analysis of Out-Sourcing vs. In-House Labor Conducted for this service? Not Applicable.
b) If Yes, what is the total cost or total savings of utilizing Out-Sourcing vs. In-House Labor for this service? Not Applicable.