Skip to main content
File #: 23-0586    Version: 1 Name:
Type: BOA Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 8/15/2023 In control: Board of Adjustment
On agenda: 9/7/2023 Final action:
Title: ZV(R)2023-0096 & 0097, Marilu Verdecia & Carlos Usallan, 17840 NW 15 Court
Attachments: 1. 23-0586 (Usallan)

Title

ZV(R)2023-0096 & 0097, Marilu Verdecia & Carlos Usallan, 17840 NW 15 Court

 

Summary Explanation and Background

 

SUMMARY EXPLANATION AND BACKGROUND:

PROJECT DESCRIPTION / BACKGROUND:

 

Carlos Usallan, owner, has submitted two residential zoning variance requests to build a circular driveway at the property located at 17840 NW 15 Court. The property is part of the Silver Lakes Planned Unit Development (PUD) and follows the guidelines for single-family homes with a lot larger than 5,000 square feet. The PUD guidelines do not address front lot coverage and driveway width; therefore, the provisions of the City’s Land Development Code (LDC) are applicable.

                     On March 15, 2023, the owner submitted a building permit application (No. RX23-03641) to build a circular driveway at the property. The proposed driveway exceeds the limitations of the City’s LDC, so the permit cannot be issued.

The applicant is requesting the following:

 

                     ZV(R) 2023-0098 to allow 36% front lot coverage (total) instead of the allowed 35% for a proposed circular driveway in typical single-family residential lot.

 

                     ZV(R) 2023-0099 to allow 47% of the lot’s width instead of the allowed 40% of the lot’s width for a proposed circular driveway in a typical single-family residential lot.

 

The applicant is aware that Board consideration of a residential variance request does not preclude the property owner from obtaining all necessary development related approvals or permits.

The subject property is in the Silver Lakes neighborhood. The owner has provided a copy of the Homeowners Association (HOA) approval, dated January 4, 2023.

VARIANCE REQUEST DETAILS:

 

ZV(R) 2023-0098 to allow a 36% total front lot coverage instead of the required 35% total front lot coverage for a proposed circular driveway.

 

ZV(R) 2023-0099 to allow a 47% width of lot instead of the allowed 40% width of lot for a proposed circular driveway.

 

Code Reference:

Table 155.620 Accessory Building and Structures

ZV(R) 2023-0098) Type, Driveway, Circular, Maximum Dimensions, 35% front lot coverage

ZV(R) 2023-0099) Type, Driveway, Circular, Maximum Dimensions, 40 % width of lot

 

VARIANCE DETERMINATION:

The Board of Adjustment shall not grant any single-family residential variances, permits, or make any decision, finding, and determination unless it first determines that:

 

Its decision and action taken is in harmony with the general purposes of the zoning ordinances of the city and is not contrary to the public interest, health, or welfare, taking into account the character and use of adjoining buildings and those in the vicinity, the number of persons residing or working in the buildings, and traffic conditions in the vicinity.

 

In the granting of single-family residential variances, the Board shall follow Section 155.301(O) Variance:

 

1.                     Purpose: To allow for the provision of relief from certain development standards of this LDC for one or more of the following reasons:

 

a)                     There are special circumstances or conditions applying to the land or building for which the variance is sought, which circumstances are peculiar to the land or building and do not apply generally to land or buildings in the neighborhood, and that the strict application of the provisions of the zoning ordinances would result in an unnecessary hardship and deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of the land or building; or

 

b)                     Any alleged hardship is not self-created by any person having an interest in the property nor is the result of a mere disregard for or in ignorance of the provisions of the zoning ordinances of the city; or

 

c)                     Granting the variance is not incompatible with public policy, will not adversely affect any adjacent property owners, and that the circumstances which cause the special conditions are peculiar to the subject property.