Skip to main content
File #: 23-0638    Version: 1 Name: Police - Safariland Holsters
Type: Bid Status: Passed
File created: 9/6/2023 In control: City Commission
On agenda: 9/20/2023 Final action: 9/20/2023
Title: MOTION TO AWARD IFB # PD-23-02 "POLICE - SAFARILAND HOLSTERS" TO THE MOST RESPONSIVE/RESPONSIBLE BIDDER, LOU'S POLICE DISTRIBUTORS, IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $41,729.80.
Sponsors: Police
Attachments: 1. 1. PD-23-02 Bid Tabulation, 2. 2. Lou's Police Distributors - Bid Submittal, 3. 3. PD-23-02 Police - Safariland Holsters

Title

MOTION TO AWARD IFB # PD-23-02 "POLICE - SAFARILAND HOLSTERS" TO THE MOST RESPONSIVE/RESPONSIBLE BIDDER, LOU'S POLICE DISTRIBUTORS, IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $41,729.80.

 

Summary Explanation and Background

 

PROCUREMENT PROCESS TAKEN:

 

- Chapter 35 of the City’s Code of Ordinances is titled “PROCUREMENT PROCEDURES, PUBLIC FUNDS.”

 

- Section 35.15 defines an Invitation for Bid as “A written solicitation for competitive sealed bids with the title, date and hour of the public bid opening designated therein and specifically defining the commodities or services for which bids are sought.  The invitation for bid shall be used when the city is capable of specifically defining the scope of work for which a service is required or when the city is capable of establishing 15 precise specifications defining the actual commodities required.  The invitation for bid shall include instructions to bidders, plans, drawings and specifications, if any, bid form and other required forms and documents to be submitted with the bid.”

 

- Section 35.18 of the City's Code of Ordinances is titled "COMPETITIVE BIDDING OR COMPETITIVE PROPOSALS REQUIRED; EXCEPTIONS.

 

- Section 35.18(A) states, "A purchase of or contracts for commodities or services that is estimated by the Chief Procurement Officer to cost more than $25,000 shall be based on sealed competitive solicitations as determined by the Chief Procurement Officer, except as specifically provided herein."

 

- Section 35.19 of the City's Code of Ordinances is titled "SEALED COMPETITIVE BIDDING PROCEDURE."

 

- Section 35.19(A) states "All sealed competitive solicitations as defined in § 35.18 shall be presented to the City Commission for their consideration prior to advertisement."

 

- Section 35.21 of the City's Code of Ordinances is titled "AWARD OF CONTRACT."

 

- Section 35.21(A) of the City's Code of Ordinances is titled "City Commission approval.

 

- Section 35.21(A)(1) states, "An initial purchase of, or contract for, commodities or services, in excess of $25,000, shall require the approval of the City Commission, regardless of whether the competitive bidding or competitive proposal procedures were followed."

 

SUMMARY EXPLANATION AND BACKGROUND:

1.  On August 2, 2023, the City Commission authorized the advertisement of IFB # PD-23-02 "Police - Safariland Holsters", which was advertised on August 8, 2023.

 

2.  The City of Pembroke Pines is seeking bids from qualified firms to provide Safariland holsters for the Glock 47 MOS7  9MM with AIMPOINT ACRO P2. Blacked out rear and Tritium front and Streamlight TLR-1 HL Rail Mounted Tac Light.

 

3.  On August 22, 2023, the City opened four (4) proposals from the following vendors, listed in order of lowest to highest pricing:

 

Image First Uniforms dba Madim LLC

 

 

 

Item

QTY

Unit Price

Total Cost

Safariland - 6378RDS RH

60

$78.00

$4,680.00

Safariland - 6378RDS LH

20

$78.00

$1,560.00

Safariland - 6360RDS RH

260

$78.00

$20,280.00

Safariland - 6360RDS LH

40

$78.00

$3,120.00

 

 

 

$29,640.00

 

 

 

 

Lous Police Distributors

 

 

 

Item

QTY

Unit Price

Total Cost

Safariland - 6378RDS RH

60

$75.56

$4,533.60

Safariland - 6378RDS LH

20

$75.56

$1,511.20

Safariland - 6360RDS RH

260

$118.95

$30,927.00

Safariland - 6360RDS LH

40

$118.95

$4,758.00

 

 

 

$41,729.80

 

 

 

 

G T Distributors, Inc.

 

 

 

Item

QTY

Unit Price

Total Cost

Safariland - 6378RDS RH

60

$85.75

$5,145.00

Safariland - 6378RDS LH

20

$85.75

$1,715.00

Safariland - 6360RDS RH

260

$134.92

$35,079.20

Safariland - 6360RDS LH

40

$134.92

$5,396.80

 

 

 

$47,336.00

 

 

 

 

Tiles In Style DBA Taza Supplies LLC

 

 

 

Item

QTY

Unit Price

Total Cost

Safariland - 6378RDS RH

60

$600.00

$36,000.00

Safariland - 6378RDS LH

20

$600.00

$12,000.00

Safariland - 6360RDS RH

260

$700.00

$182,000.00

Safariland - 6360RDS LH

40

$700.00

$28,000.00

 

 

 

$258,000.00

 

4.  During the submittal review process, Image First Uniforms dba Madim, LLC. informed the Procurement Department that they had submitted the wrong cost for the Safariland 6360RDS RH and 6360RDS LH, and would not be able to hold the pricing on their submittal, as a result, First Uniforms dba Madim, LLC. would be deemed non-responsive.

 

5.  The Police Department has reviewed the proposals and has deemed Lou's Police Distributors to be the most responsive/responsible bidder.

 

6.  In addition, Lou's Police Distributors has also completed the Equal Benefits Certification Form and has stated that the "Contractor currently complies with the requirements of this section."

 

7.  Request Commission to award IFB # PD-23-02 "Police - Safariland Holsters” to the most responsive/responsible bidder, Lou's Police Distributors in an amount not to exceed $41,729.80.

 

Reviewed by Commission Auditor.

 

Financial Impact

FINANCIAL IMPACT DETAIL:

 

a)   Initial Cost:  $41,729.80

b)   Amount budgeted for this item in Account No: This is budgeted in account # 001-521-3001-552600-0000-000-0000: Clothing/Uniform.

c)   Source of funding for difference, if not fully budgeted: Not Applicable.

d)   5 year projection of the operational cost of the project Not Applicable.

e)   Detail of additional staff requirements:  Not Applicable.

 

 

FEASIBILITY REVIEW:

 

A feasibility review is required for the award, renewal and/or expiration of all function sourcing contracts.  This analysis is to determine the financial effectiveness of function sourcing services.

a)   Was a Feasibility Review/Cost Analysis of Out-Sourcing vs. In-House Labor Conducted for this service?  Not Applicable.

b)   If Yes, what is the total cost or total savings of utilizing Out-Sourcing vs. In-House Labor for this service? Not Applicable.