Skip to main content
File #: 23-0108    Version: 1 Name:
Type: BOA Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 1/31/2023 In control: Board of Adjustment
On agenda: 3/2/2023 Final action:
Title: ZV(R) 2023-0003 & 0004, Karina Bentancur, 18951 NW 19 Street
Attachments: 1. ZV(R)2023-0003 & 0004 (Bentancur) 23-0108
Title
ZV(R) 2023-0003 & 0004, Karina Bentancur, 18951 NW 19 Street

Summary Explanation and Background

SUMMARY EXPLANATION AND BACKGROUND:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION / BACKGROUND:

Karina Betancur, owner, has submitted two variance requests for a proposed driveway:

· ZV(R)2023-0003 is to allow a 63% total front lot coverage for a Single Family Residential Zero Lot instead of the allowed 40% total front lot coverage for a new driveway.
· ZV(R)2023-0004 is to allow 61% total width instead of the allowed 40% for total driveway width for a new driveway.

The applicant is aware that Board consideration of a residential variance request does not preclude the property owner from obtaining all necessary development related approvals or permits.
The subject property is in Chapel Trail Neighborhood. Ms. Betancur has supplied HOA Letter of approval and letters of support from her neighbors.
VARIANCE REQUEST DETAILS:

ZV(R) 2023-0003 to allow a 63% total front lot coverage for a Single Family Residential, Zero Lot instead of the allowed 40% total front lot coverage for a proposed driveway.

ZV(R) 2023-0004 to allow a 61% total width instead of the allowed 40% for total driveway width for a proposed driveway.

Code Reference: Table 155.620 Accessory Building and Structures.
Table 155.620 Accessory Building and Structures
Type, Driveway, Zero Lot Line, Maximum Dimensions, 40% front lot coverage
Type, Driveway, Zero Lot Line, Maximum Dimensions, 40% Width of lot

VARIANCE DETERMINATION:

The Board of Adjustment shall not grant any single-family residential variances, permits, or make any decision, finding, and determination unless it first determines that:
Its decision and action taken is in harmony with the general purposes of the zoning ordinances of the city and is not contrary to the public interest, health, or welfare, taking into account the character and use of adjoining buildings and those in the vicinity, the number of persons residing or working in the buildings, and tra...

Click here for full text