File #: 19-0923    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Bid Status: Passed
File created: 7/25/2019 In control: City Commission
On agenda: 8/7/2019 Final action: 8/7/2019
Title: MOTION TO APPROVE THE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE EVALUATION COMMITTEE AND TO AWARD ED-18-02 “CHARTER SCHOOL BUS AND STUDENT TRACKER” TO REAXIUM, INC. AND TO DIRECT THE CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE A CONTRACT FOR SERVICES.
Attachments: 1. 1. ED-18-02 - Bid Tabulation, 2. 2. ED-18-02 Conflict of Interest Forms, 3. 3. 5-06-2019 Meeting Minutes, 4. 4. 7-10-2019 Meeting Minutes, 5. 5. 7-10-2019 Rankings and Score Sheets, 6. 6. Submittal from ReaXium Inc., 7. 7. ED-18-02 - Charter School Bus Tracker
Title

MOTION TO APPROVE THE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE EVALUATION COMMITTEE AND TO AWARD ED-18-02 “CHARTER SCHOOL BUS AND STUDENT TRACKER” TO REAXIUM, INC. AND TO DIRECT THE CITY MANAGER TO NEGOTIATE A CONTRACT FOR SERVICES.

Summary Explanation and Background

SUMMARY EXPLANATION AND BACKGROUND:

1.  On February 6, 2019, the City Commission authorized the advertisement of ED-18-02 “Charter School Bus and Student Tracker”, which was advertised on February 12, 2019.

2.  The purpose of this solicitation was to find a qualified firm to offer the Charter Schools a transportation and student rider management system with routing and tracking software, with the potential option of generating revenue.

3.  On April 9, 2019, the City opened three (3) proposals from the following vendors:

     Vendor Name          

     Artha Systems LLC

     ReaXium, Inc.

     Transfinder Corporation

4.  On May 6, 2019, the City convened an evaluation committee to evaluate the qualifications of the proposers based on the weighted criteria provided for in the bid documents and listed below:

     - Experience and Ability (25%)

     - Relevant Past Projects (25%)

     - Firm’s Understanding and Approach to the Work (25%)

     - Project Cost (15%)

     - Revenue Sharing Option (5%)

     - Local Vendor Preference/Veteran Owned Small Business Preference (5%)

5.  At the May 6, 2019 meeting, the evaluators discussed that one of the vendors had not provided some of the requested information. Artha Systems did not submit a list of their current on-going projects, which is part of one of the scoring sections; and they did not submit the W9 form, which is informational only and is not a scoring criteria. By consensus, members choose to allow Artha Systems to continue through the process.

6.  The evaluation committee discussed the difficulty of proceeding to scoring as there were different products being offered in the proposals received and it was difficult...

Click here for full text