File #: 21-0134    Version: 1 Name:
Type: BOA Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 2/24/2021 In control: Board of Adjustment
On agenda: 3/4/2021 Final action:
Title: ZV(R) 2020-38, Alber Araujo, 10660 NW 20 Street
Attachments: 1. 21-0134 (Araujo)
Title
ZV(R) 2020-38, Alber Araujo, 10660 NW 20 Street

Summary Explanation and Background

SUMMARY EXPLANATION AND BACKGROUND:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION / BACKGROUND:

Alber Araujo, owner, has submitted variance request ZV(R) 2020-38 to allow 65% total front yard coverage with a proposed driveway and walkway. Proposed design includes 4” artificial turf joints thru out the driveway for drainage.
There is not a Homeowner’s Association for this community.

VARIANCE REQUEST DETAILS:

ZV(R) 2020-38 allow a 65% total front lot coverage instead of the required 35% total front lot coverage for a proposed driveway and walkway.

Code Reference: § 52.26 DRIVEWAYS ACROSS SWALE AREAS.
(H) No driveway may: (1) Exceed a 35% of the total front lot coverage in a single family residential home; or

VARIANCE DETERMINATION:

The Board of Adjustment shall not grant any single-family residential variances, permits, or make any decision, finding, and determination unless it first determines that:
Its decision and action taken is in harmony with the general purposes of the zoning ordinances of the city and is not contrary to the public interest, health, or welfare, taking into account the character and use of adjoining buildings and those in the vicinity, the number of persons residing or working in the buildings, and traffic conditions in the vicinity.
In the granting of single-family residential variances, the Board shall determine that the single-family residential variance granted is the minimum variance that will accomplish the intended purpose in accordance with above and:
A) That there are special circumstances or conditions applying to the land or building for which the variance is sought, which circumstances are peculiar to the land or building and do not apply generally to land or buildings in the neighborhood, and that the strict application of the provisions of the zoning ordinances would result in an unnecessary hardship and deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of t...

Click here for full text