File #: 22-0733    Version: 1 Name: Edison Residential Site Plan
Type: Site Plan Status: Passed
File created: 9/12/2022 In control: City Commission
On agenda: 9/21/2022 Final action: 9/21/2022
Title: MOTION TO APPROVE THE EDISON PEMBROKE RESIDENTIAL SITE PLAN FOR HEIGHT AND A SITE PLAN DEVELOPMENT WITHIN A PLANNED DISTRICT, AS RECOMMENDED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD; GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF PEMBROKE ROAD EAST  I-75 AND  WEST OF SOUTHWEST 145 AVENUE.
Sponsors: Planning and Economic Development
Attachments: 1. 1. Consent Affidavit, 2. 2. Unified Development Application, 3. 3. Letter of Intent, 4. 4. Sustainability Statement, 5. 5. Economic Impact Analysis, 6. 6. Ordinance 1985 (Edison) lupa ordinance, 7. 7. Site Plan (Selected Sheets), 8. 8. Location Map, 9. 9. PZB Minutes 8-11-2022, 10. 10. Site Plan

Title

MOTION TO APPROVE THE EDISON PEMBROKE RESIDENTIAL SITE PLAN FOR HEIGHT AND A SITE PLAN DEVELOPMENT WITHIN A PLANNED DISTRICT, AS RECOMMENDED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD; GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF PEMBROKE ROAD EAST  I-75 AND  WEST OF SOUTHWEST 145 AVENUE.

 

Summary Explanation and Background

 

SUMMARY EXPLANATION AND BACKGROUND:

1.  Dennis Mele, agent for owners Pembroke Parcel 2 Owners LLC and Pembroke 145 Office LLC. (Collectively - TPA Group), requests site plan consideration to build a 350 unit apartment building with associated surface and structured parking, traffic circulation, landscape, and lighting on a vacant parcel   generally located north of Pembroke Road, east of I-75 and west southwest 145 Avenue.

2.  The City Commission approved the original Pembroke Pointe  Planned Commercial District (PCD) map rezoning and design guidelines on June 6, 2007 via Ordinance 1584.  The applicant and land owner at that time (Duke Realty) contemplated the development of four identical class A office buildings on +- 35 acres of property.  Only one of the contemplated Duke buildings were ever built. 

3.  In 2017, a +- 25 acre portion of the PCD was sold to the TPA group who applied for a modification to the Pembroke Pointe PCD guidelines to accommodate a new office design (AKA: Edison office) in lieu of the three buildings which were not built by Duke Realty.  The City Commission approved the PCD update (Ordinance 1893) and Edison office site plan on February 7, 2018.  To date, roughly half of the Edison office building / site (north office / parking field) has been completed. 

4.  The City Commission on March 2, 2021 approved (5-0) the Edison Residential Land Use Plan Amendment (PH 2021-02 - Ordinance 1985) which revised the underlying land use for the southern +-7.6 acres of the TPA group property from Office to Irregular Residential 46.1 for the purposes of developing up to 350 multi-family units.  The approval included a voluntary affordable housing fund commitment of $500 per unit built to be paid at issuance of building permit.

5.  The City Commission at its June 15, 2022 meeting approved (5-0) related zoning change applications which permitted the proposed site plan to move forward:

                     ZC 2021-01 - A related zoning text change to create MXD design guidelines for the subject +- 25 acres to accommodate the Edison residential, hotel, office, and bank buildings.

                     ZC 2022-03 - A related zoning map change to the subject +-25 acre property from Planned Community Development (PCD) zoning to Mixed Use Development (MXD) to accommodate a mixture of residential and non-residential uses as permitted by underlying land use.

 

                     ZC 2022-04 - A zoning change to the Pembroke Pointe Planned Commercial Development (PCD) which formally reduces the district from +-35 acres to +-10 acres with associated text change to accommodate the reduced district size.

6.  The approval of the zoning change applications above included a voluntary commitment by the applicant of $500,000 toward future city roadway improvements prior to issuance of a building permit. 

 

7.  The City Commission at its September 7, 2022 meeting approved (3-2) a plat note  change to the Duke Pembroke B plat  to assign the 350 residential units to this plat. 

 

8.  The applicant proposes a seven story, 72 feet high, 350 unit apartment building with accessory attached parking structure (7 levels - 58 feet high to roof parking level).  The proposed apartment will consist of the following unit mix:

                     158 one bedroom units

o                     2 unit types

o                     Unit Area: 750-751 SF

 

                     179 two bedroom units

o                     5 unit types 

o                     Unit Area: 1,120 - 1,153 SF

 

                     13 three bedroom units

o                     1 unit type 

o                     Unit Area: 1,389 SF

 

9.  The proposed apartment building units will be oriented to the east side of the lot with the attached parking garage to the west.  This orientation utilizes the garage as a buffer to the residents and the activity along Interstate 75. 

 

10.  The applicant proposes the following color selections for the building and parking garage:

                     Main Stucco - SW 7006 - Extra White

                     Accent Colors-

                     o                     SW 7649- Silverplate

                     o                     SW 7674 - Peppercorn

                     o                     SW 7069 - Iron Ore

                     o                     SW 7003 - Touque White

                     o                     SW 6252 - Ice Cube

                                          o                     Stone Veneer - Beige

                                          o                     Picket Railing (Balconies) - Silver

 

Open areas of the garage will be screened by wire mesh which provides necessary air ventilation for the use.

 

11.  City Commission review of this project is required for this site per City Code for the following reasons:

                     Building exceeds 50 feet and height

                     Site plan consideration within a planned district (MXD)

12.  Access to this site will remain through the existing main driveway on Southwest 145 Avenue as well as cross access with the office building site to the north. Main access to the building will be through the east elevation.  The applicant provides for a drop off lane at the main entrance of the apartment building for the convenience of residents and guests.

13.  Staff notes that driveways currently interconnect the parking fields of the existing developments along the west side of the Southwest 145 Avenue corridor from Pines Boulevard to Pembroke Road.  This includes the parking fields of the Shops at Pembroke Gardens, Pembroke Pointe office, Edison office, Fairfield Hotel, and Keiser University. 

14.  The applicant will provide 2,082 parking spaces in total upon completion of phase 1 of the Edison MXD where 1,690 parking spaces are required for the office and residential buildings for the entire Edison MXD.  The parking will be distributed based on the following:

Residential site:

                     859 parking spaces in the structured parking garage.

o                     6 spaces within the parking garage will contain EV units.

o                     Additional 6 spaces within the parking garage will contain conduit for future EV use.

15.  The general public will be permitted to park on the ground floor of the structured parking garage.  A gate arm will be provided on the second floor of the parking garage for security purposes.  Access to floor 2 and above of the parking garage will be limited to apartment tenants and Edison office employees.

                     349 surface parking spaces on residential / southern office parking field

Office site:

                     874 surface spaces for the office park parcels to the north

Of the total number of spaces provided in the Edison MXD property the following spaces will be reserved for specific use:

                     50 ADA spaces

                     29 surface spaces (office parcels) will be reserved for car pool. 

                     46 spaces (office parcels) will be reserved for fuel efficient vehicles

16.  As a portion of the required parking for the office use is being provided on the residential site, the applicant has agreed to enter into a shared parking / access agreement between the residential and office properties within the Edison MXD.  This agreement will be required to be recorded prior to issuance of a building permit for the residential project. 

The applicant will be required to submit a master sign plan for both the residential and office parcels to the Planning and Zoning Board at a later date.  No signs are being considered at this time.

 

17.  The following landscape is being proposed for this site:

                     Installation of 232 trees, 232 palms, 5160 shrubs and 8621 ground covers.  Primary species of trees include, Gumbo Limbo, Green Buttonwood, crape myrtle and Live oak. Primary species of palms include Sabal palm, Solitaire palm, and Alexander palm. Primary species of shrubs and ground cover include Pink Muhly grass, Philodendron, Horizontal Cocoplum, Blueberry Flax lily, Green Island Ficus and Boston fern.

18.  Edison residential site will be illuminated by a series of black full cut off LED fixtures mounted atop 20-25 foot concrete poles.  Parking structure lighting will be required to be recessed into the ceiling of each floor.  The parking structure roof has been designed with full cut off fixtures mounted on 20 foot poles.  The light poles on the roof are located internal to the roof parking field in order to minimize their visual impact on adjacent properties.

19.  The proposed apartment site will contain several common areas for the enjoyment of its residents.  Among those areas include:

                     A landscaped courtyard with seating located on the western interior of the apartment building.

                     A pool and deck area with recreational grassed areas, trellis seating and BBQ facilities near the main entrance to the development.

                     A dog park on the southwest corner of the site.

In addition the developer will provide a mulch fitness path on the west side of the property running north/south adjacent to I-75 and then continuing in an easterly direction along the south property line.  This will be a continuation to the approved path system to the north.

20.  Garbage will be stored in a designated trash room at the southwest corner of the residential building, just south of the parking garage.  WASTEPRO has reviewed the trash pickup location and has no objections to service.

21.  The applicant provides an Economic Analysis as part of this project.  The developer expects the total cost of the project to be $113,000,000 which includes land, design, soft costs and construction.  Estimated taxes generated will be over $1.8 million annually.  The applicant also expects the construction of this apartment to generate 438 jobs.

22.  The applicant also provides a sustainability statement as required by City Code.  The applicant intends to attain a minimum bronze rating for the residential building through the National Green Building Standards.  In addition, the applicant provides a list of sustainable materials / techniques in the backup.  Items of note include the following:

                                          Electric Vehicle ‘EV’ charging stations

                                          Tree Preservation and relocation of larger trees on site.

                                          SEER 15 AC equipment or better

                                          Reflective White roof to reduce heat island

                                          High LRV color pallet to reduce heat gain

                                          ENERGY STAR appliances

                                          High Efficiency Lighting

                                          Low-flow toilets, shower fixtures and faucets

                                          Use of drought tolerant plant material

                                          Water Sense or similar irrigation controller

                                          Use of Low VOC products inside the building air barrier

                                          MERV 8 filters to improve indoor air quality

                                          Multi-use path or trail

                                          Transit stop adjacent to the property and future shuttle stop

                                          Recycling C&D Waste Hauler

 

23.  The Planning and Zoning Board at its August 11, 2022 meeting voted (5-0) to transmit this application with a favorable recommendation subject to the following conditions:

1.                     City Commission approval of the building exceeding 50 feet in height and for a site plan within a planned MXD district.

2.                     Recordation of a shared parking / access agreement between the residential and office uses within the MXD.

3.                     City Commission approval and recordation of the Duke Pembroke B plat note change prior to issuance of a building permit. (Duke Pembroke B plat approved by City Commission on September 7, 2022)

4.                     Applicant to submit a master sign plan for Planning and Zoning Board review at a later date.  Master sign plan approval will be required prior to issuance of new sign permits.

24. The applicant has submitted a consent agenda affidavit and agrees with the findings of the Planning and Zoning Board.

 

25. Administration recommends approving Site Plan 2021-15, Edison Pembroke Residential.

 

Financial Impact

FINANCIAL IMPACT DETAIL:

 

a)   Initial Cost:  None

b)   Amount budgeted for this item in Account No: Not Applicable

c)   Source of funding for difference, if not fully budgeted: Not Applicable.

d)   5 year projection of the operational cost of the project Not Applicable.

e)   Detail of additional staff requirements:  Not Applicable.

 

FEASIBILITY REVIEW:

 

A feasibility review is required for the award, renewal and/or expiration of all function sourcing contracts.  This analysis is to determine the financial effectiveness of function sourcing services.

a)   Was a Feasibility Review/Cost Analysis of Out-Sourcing vs. In-House Labor Conducted for this service?  Not Applicable.