File #: 23-0281    Version: 1 Name:
Type: BOA Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 4/12/2023 In control: Board of Adjustment
On agenda: 5/4/2023 Final action:
Title: ZV(R) 2023-0035 & 0047 - 0049, Gary & Penina Rosenthal, 1674 SW 158 Terrace
Attachments: 1. 23-0281 (Rosenthal)
Title
ZV(R) 2023-0035 & 0047 - 0049, Gary & Penina Rosenthal, 1674 SW 158 Terrace

Summary Explanation and Background

SUMMARY EXPLANATION AND BACKGROUND:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION / BACKGROUND:

Gary Rosenthal, owner, has submitted four residential zoning variance requests for a proposed attached open sided roofed patio and an existing paver patio for the property located at 1674 SW 158 Terrace. The property is part of the Grand Palms Planned Unit Development (PUD) and follows the City’s Land Development Code Section 155.652-Zero Lot Line Homes; and Accessory Structures Table 155.620. This request is subject to the City’s Land Development Code.
Zoning Variance requests

· ZV(R) 2023-0035 is to allow a 2.1’ side setback to the zero-side (south) property line for a proposed roofed open sided patio instead of the required 5’.
· ZV(R) 2023-0047 is to allow zero feet (0’) side setback (south) instead of the required five-foot (5’) setback to zero side property line for an existing paver patio.
· ZV(R) 2023-0048 is to allow zero feet (0’) rear setback (west) instead of the required five-foot (5’) setback to rear property line for an existing paver patio.
· ZV(R) 2023-0049 is to allow zero feet (0’) side setback (north) instead of the required five-foot (5’) non-zero side setback for an existing paver patio.

Mr. Rosenthal applied for a permit for a proposed roofed open sided patio (Permit Application #RO22-09684). During review of the permit application, it was determined that the side setback did not meet code requirements. In addition, it was discovered the existing paver patio was not permitted and did not meet the required setbacks. Code Violation # 230401660 for work without permit has been initiated. The variance requests are requesting to allow the proposed roofed patio and legalize the existing paver patio.
The applicant is aware that Board consideration of residential variance request do not preclude the property owner from obtaining all necessary development ...

Click here for full text